
Everyone's got an opinion about the way Netflix presented the first season of House of Cards. Some say it set the precedent for the future of TV. Some say it redefined the "spoiler alert" as we know it. Some say it was downright risky. But those are just words. A study
(or quick data pulled from Google) from Feb. 19 essentially concluded
that releasing all episodes at once ruined the show's chance to grow
because it hindered the social media factor. As someone who sits behind a
computer screen all day, following trends and interacting with
colleagues via Twitter, Facebook, Tumblr, and several social media sites
that are barely past beta testing, I wholeheartedly agree.
The format of the show did affect my engagement with social media. I barely commented about any of the House of Cards
episodes — even that raunchy final scene in Episode 7 (your eyes are
probably all !! right now if you know what I mean) — because I didn't
know who I'd be talking to and didn't want to spoil anything. Instead,
for the first time in a while, it forced me to talk at length out loud about a current show with a real live actual human being. Perish the thought!
RELATED: Richard III's Bones Identified Right As 'House of Cards' Debuts
I am constantly reading stories that highlight the downfall of my
generation: How all we do is keep our eyes glued to our phones and
computer screens, which leads to the conclusion that we have lost the
ability to communicate, go on "offline" dates, or interact with our
bosses. It's a nonstop double standard of "learn fast, grow, and change
the world" met with "slow down, get off your devices, and have a real
connection with someone." Critics are fast to negatively judge Netflix's
strategic gamble of dumping all 13 episodes at once for mass
consumption, but the fact that I had to actively find someone to chat
with through each omigod moment brought the kind of
conversation I realized my life was missing. It was like (pre-Twitter)
high school, when I'd call my best friend at the commercial break and
we'd gasp in unison about whatever life-altering Joey Potter moment had
just occurred. (Thankfully she never married a Scientologist.) The data
may prove that binge-watching House of Cards forfeited the advantage of sharing thoughts digitally, but it helped us to gain something far more valuable: human interaction.
And it's not just about House of Cards — though how could
you not dash to find someone when Underwood did that thing to Russo that
I guess I still can't mention here — it's about binge-watching in
general. When I sat home and faked sick so that I could speed through Felicity, Breaking Bad, Lost, Friday Night Lights,
and other pop cultural touchstones, I made sure I had a pal to recap
with. If not a friend binging at the same time as I was, then someone
who loved these shows so much they were willing to go through all the
details with me even years after they originally aired. Doing so made
discussing Felicity and Noel's dorm room Boggle kiss, or Jesse and
Walt's nice lunch with Tuco and Tio Salamanca, or everything about Coach
Taylor that much greater.
RELATED: Netflix's 'House of Cards': Is Traditional TV Viewing Over?
These game-changing shows did not need social media to gauge a following, just as House of Cards
does not need people on Twitter or Facebook making dumb jokes about
Robin Wright being a "MILF." What sort of engagement does that really
prove, anyway? Though numbers from social media are tangible, it hardly
determines whether someone is genuinely interested in a show or simply
waiting for the next idiotic parody account. And if we're more concerned
with a show's numbers than we are with how engrossed viewers are — and
how much they are actually deriving from each watch — then, really,
we're all just one embarrassing contradiction.
Whether or not the first season of House of Cards was a win
on social media, it was not a "mistake." And it certainly doesn't mean
people weren't actually talking about each episode, thoroughly and with
emotion. In fact, there were fewer fleeting thoughts and sudden
judgments and instead, more thought-provoking debates. On social media,
there's always pressure to be witty and to say something that hasn't
been brought up already — at least from what your timeline can tell —
but when I'm physically facing a friend over a beer, we can discuss that
cryptic spider comment for as long as we want, without a word count
restriction. Perhaps, if the world can even handle such a backpedal,
this is how we should be measuring a show's success after all.
source


Thursday, February 21, 2013
Kids96
Posted in: 



0 komentar:
Post a Comment